Avodah Zarah 53

In the 80s, if you called someone a “nimrod” you were basically calling them an idiot. But, Nimrod, is a biblical figure. Great-grandson of Noah, son of Cush, and leader of the people after the flood. According to Legend, the man who commissioned the building of the Tower of Babel. On our daf today, it seems as though the rabbis of their time could still visit the “Temple of Nimrod.” This is a place you can visit in Israel. While I had not associated it with the actual Nimrod and the Tower of Babel, our rabbis seem to believe they are one and the same . . .

Rabbi Yirmeya bar Abba says that Rav says: The temple of Nimrod, i.e., the remnants of the tower of Babel (see Genesis 11:1–9), is considered a place of idol worship whose worshippers abandoned it in peacetime, and it is therefore permitted. This is despite the fact that when the Merciful One scattered the builders of the tower, the situation resembled wartime, as they were compelled to leave. Nevertheless, if they had desired to return, they could have returned. Since they did not return, they evidently chose to abandon the place of idol worship and thereby revoked its status.

The issue here is that, idols abandoned in times of peace are permitted. However, those abandoned in times of war are forbidden (As it was not the gentile’s choice to leave and so it has not had it’s status as an object of idolatry revoked). The daf seems to assume that this temple of Nimrod is the same Nimrod from the Tower of Babel. If so, it was not their choice to leave, God scattered them, and so the status of the objects as idolatrous would remain. However, sense they have not returned and could have – their status as idolatrous is revoked.

It’s interesting for the rabbis to attribute this ancient cite to Nimrod. And for them to make it so we can go and visit! In all my many trips to Israel, I never have. Now I have a new spot I want to see!

This also adds a layer onto the Tower of Babel story. Rabbis have always read the story and wondered what the people did that was so wrong. Now we get the implication that the rabbis associate the Tower with Idolatry. The people wanted to “make a name for ourselves.” We, too, can be the subjects of idolatry, not just inanimate objects and trees.

Avodah Zarah 52

Is this chapter really about idol worship? Bowing down to idols? Or maybe something a little more common . . . like corruption?

Reish Lakish says: Anyone who appoints over the community a judge who is unfit for the position, due to his lack of knowledge or wickedness, is considered as though he plants an ashera among the Jewish people, as it is stated: “Judges and officers you shall make for yourself in all of your gates” (Deuteronomy 16:18), and juxtaposed to it is the verse: “You shall not plant for yourself an ashera of any kind of tree beside the altar of the Lord your God” (Deuteronomy 16:21).

Rav Ashi says: And if one appoints an unsuitable individual as a judge in a place where there are Torah scholars, it is as though he planted an ashera next to the altar, as it is stated: “Beside the altar of the Lord your God.”

Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish creates a midrash based on the juxtaposition of the verses in Deuteronomy 16. By doing this he teaches that this verse isn’t just about bowing to idols, it’s about corruption. He compares appointing an unworthy judge to planting an idolatrous tree and says that appointing such a judge in a place where there are sages is like planting such a tree next to the altar itself.

I really like this. Idolatry is not so much about bowing to stone. It’s more about not fearing God. Not walking in God’s ways. Being corrupt. Being lawless. Appointing inappropriate judges, putting friends in places of power. Putting money and your own agenda before what’s right, before what God wants.

Avodah Zarah 51

Want to visit Turkish baths or Japanese gardens on vacation, but scared you’re supporting idol worship? Well, today’s daf should help you.

MISHNA: In the case of an object of idol worship that had a garden or a bathhouse, one may derive benefit from them when it is not to the advantage of the idol worship, but one may not derive benefit from them when it is to their advantage. If the garden or bathhouse belonged jointly to the place of idol worship and to others, one may derive benefit from them, both when it is to their advantage and when it is not to their advantage.

How do we know what it means for your visit to be for thei benefit of idol worship? The Gemara explains:

Abaye says: The case where use of the garden or bathhouse is to the financial advantage of the idol worship is referring to a case where it is to the financial advantage of the priests [komarin], who receive payment for the use of the garden or bathhouse. The case where it is not to their financial advantage is referring to a case where it is not to the financial advantage of the priests. This is to the exclusion of a situation where using the facility is only to the financial advantage of the idol’s worshippers, in which case one is permitted to derive benefit from them.

So, if your entrance fee goes to the priests, you should pass. But, if people are just trying to make a living – go for it. Enjoy!

Avodah Zarah 50

It’s not everyday the Talmud has me thinking about Jesus. It’s not everyday the rabbis of the Talmud use their slang. But today, the rabbis’ slang has me thinking about Jesus.

Exhibit a: a rabbi is so scrupulous they refer to him as “The son of holy ones”

The Gemara relates: The house of King Yannai was destroyed, and gentiles came and placed stones dedicated to Mercury in it. Later, other gentiles who did not worship Mercury came and took those stones and paved paths and streets with them. There were Rabbis who withdrew from these paths, and there were other Rabbis who did not withdraw from these paths. Rabbi Yoḥanan said: The son of holy ones בְּנָן שֶׁל קְדוֹשִׁים walks on them. Should we withdraw from them? The Gemara asks: Who is the person referred to as the son of holy ones? The Gemara answers: It is Rabbi Menaḥem, son of Rabbi Simai. And why did they call him the son of holy ones? They did so because Rabbi Menaḥem would not even gaze at the form on a coin, as it was sometimes an idolatrous symbol.

Okay, normally, money being a source of idol worship would have been my gem (because we still worship $$$!) but today it was overshadowed by my curiosity. Here, Rabbi Menahem is so righteous they refer to him as the son of the holy ones. Not far to make that turn into the son of the holy One. . .

Exhibit b: they rabbis can’t resolve a debate so they say this:

And there is neither a carpenter [naggar] nor a son of a carpenter who can resolve this, i.e., no one can resolve the difficulty inherent in this statement, not a Torah scholar, and not even a scholar who is the son of a scholar.

Do you see why I was thinking about Jesus? In Jewish thought, Jesus was a historical figure. He was rabbi. If great rabbis were described as “carpenters” or “sons of carpenters” and righteous individuals as “sons of holy ones” it just makes me wonder if Jesus, even while being called these things, maybe wasn’t really a carpenter or even the son of one.

Maybe we just need to understand the slang from the time.

Like knowing what “sigma” “6-7” and “rizz” mean today . . .

Avodah Zarah 49

While I was in rabbinical school, I was dual enrolled in the Jewish Educator program. In the program we were taught that kids who are actively being brought up both Jewish and another faith were being damaged by their parents. We talked about the “hypothetical” situation of a child who goes to CCD (Catholic Communion classes) once a week and then to Hebrew school another day of the week. “Would you do the B. Mitzvah?” That was our challenge. Our professor, who ran a religious school for a large New York Jewish congregation, said the child woudl never be allowed to be enrolled in her Hebrew school in the first place.

Then, a few months into actually serving as a full-time rabbi at my pulpit, a Bat Mitzvah family came to meet with me to start preparing for the big day. The parents explained how theirs was an interfaith house, and that their daughter attended both CCD classes and Hebrew school. I was dumbfounded. I could not believe our religious school director had allowed this to happen! And here was the student, only a couple moths from her date, having already sent invitation, bought the dress. What was I to do?

Today’s daf would have helped. But luckily, so did my Senior Rabbi at that time.

As you read, remember that an “ashera” is a tree used for idol worship. It is forbidden to derive any benefit from these forbidden trees.

MISHNA: If one took wood from an ashera, it is prohibited to derive benefit from it. In a case where one kindled a fire in an oven with the wood, if it is a new oven and by kindling the fire he hardened the oven and made it stronger for use in the future, then the oven must be shattered. Since forbidden items were used in the process of forming the oven, one may not derive benefit from the use of the forbidden items. But if it is an old oven it may be cooled; it is prohibited to use the oven only while it is still hot, but you can use it after that. If one baked bread with wood from the ashera as the fuel, it is prohibited to derive benefit from the bread. If this bread was intermingled with other bread, it is prohibited to derive benefit from all the bread.

The rabbis seem to be arguing, better safe then sorry. While most of the loaves of bread did not violate the law, we cannot know for sure which did – so dispose of all of it to be safe.

Rabbi Eliezer says: One must take the benefit and cast it into the Dead Sea. In other words, one is not required to destroy all of the loaves. Instead, one should designate money equal in value to the wood that he used from the ashera, and he should destroy this money to offset the benefit he derived from the forbidden wood. The Rabbis said to him: There is no monetary redemption for objects that are forbidden due to idol worship.

Okay! Sounds pretty firm! While Eliezer argues they should just get rid of money worth the equivalent of the forbidden bread instead of being so wasteful – the rabbis argue that you cannot trade money to compensate for using an item of idol worhsip!

This argument is repeated for fabric and then for wine. Hard line right? It doesn’t matter the situation, or how wasteful, you cannot do it!

Until . . .

The Gemara relates: There was a certain man, and it happened that a barrel of wine used for a libation became intermingled with his wine. He came before Rav Ḥisda to ask what he should do. Rav Ḥisda said to him: Take four dinars and cast them into the river, and the rest of the wine will be permitted to you.

Easy to have hard lines until someone is actually sitting before you with the problem. Someone who wants to do the right thing. Someone who wants to be part of the community.

Back to that first Bat Mitzvah girl. I went to my Senior Rabbi to share my predicament. I thought he would also be upset with our religious school director. Instead, he turned to me and said. “If you are not willing to do it, I will.”

He left me to think about what I was trying to achieve with this hard line. And I thought of what would happen if I said no. She would feel rejected, not just by me, but by Judaism. While I am only human, I am also her rabbi and therefor my eyes (to a certain extent) serve as how she feels perceived by the Jewish community. I could leave her feeling rejected, or, I could help her have an amazing memory of being celebrated by the Jewish community. I could give her one of the most memorable days of her life. If she continued to be “Jewish” or if she one day opted to be “Catholic” (or let’s be real, not religious), at least she would not leave with a bad taste in her mouth.

In the ceremony I talked about the day as a day where she celebrates her Jewish heritage. I reminded her that she was not “doe” learning about Judaism, that it takes more than a lifetime. I said I hoped she would always remember that day, and how proud she was of herself, and how proud we all were of her.

And her family cried, both Jewish and Catholic. And they were all (even the Catholic grandparents) so grateful.

Hard lines are important. They help us to live our lives with integrity. But it’s easier to have them when you are not personally dealing with the situation at hand. When you are not affecting the lives of others.

Avodah Zarah 48

For some reson this image is really staying in my mind after reading the daf.

Which tree is assumed to be an ashera, even without specific knowledge that it was worshipped? Rav says: Any tree that gentile priests sit beneath and do not taste of its fruits, as they apparently consider the fruits consecrated to the idol.

An “ashera” is a tree mentioned in the bible that Canaanites would worship. By the time of the rabbis, they no longer are exposed to this practice and so they practically want to know how to spot these forbidden trees. Elsewhere, we see that people may bow down to a tree, put an idol by a tree, or even plant the tree for idolatrous purposes. This makes it obvious that it’s a tree that used for idol worship. Here though, the priests are just getting some shade. So, how would the rabbis be able to tell if the tree is an object of idol worship?

The suggestion is that, if they don’t use/eat the fruit, it’s a sacred tree. But this image is giving me something more. Something metaphorical and (for me) deep.

Idolatry gives us temporary comfort without lasting nourishment. Ou false gods today are busyness, self-obsession, social media, material success, even perfectionism. These things offer a kind of protection or distraction (shade), but they cannot sustain our souls (fruit). The issue is that, when we cling to these things, we avoid the harder, truer work of righteousness, justice, compassion, making teshuvah.

Comforting distractions don’t last; true spiritual practice feeds us and others.

Comforting distractions don’t last; true spiritual practice feeds us and others.

The Torah is called a Tree of Life. It’s a tree that gives both shade and fruit.

Avodah Zarah 47

Many of us live in systems propped up by forces we say we oppose—racism, white supremacy, economic injustice. When something collapses (a scandal, a law overturned, a major news event), we get a clearer view of what we’re adjacent to and even that we may be propped up by these injustices. The temptation is to put the wall back where it was and pretend nothing happened. But today’s daf teaches us that we need to create distance and change the structure of our lives to that we don’t use these forms of corruption/idolatry to booster ourselves.

MISHNA: In the case of one whose house was adjacent to a house of idol worship and the dividing wall fell, it is prohibited to rebuild it. What should he do? He should withdraw into his own property four cubits and build the wall there.

The Sages assume that if your property touches a house of idolatry, the danger is not just in the idolaters’ home—it’s in the closeness, our reliance on them to maintain our status quo. When the barrier collapses, the exposure is clearer. The response is not to restore the old status quo, but to retreat and create more space.

So, here are some questions for us to think about:

  • Where do I unknowingly lean on structures built on oppression?
  • When the dividing walls crack—through protests, news, personal encounters—what would it mean to withdraw?
  • What does “four cubits” look like for me? Different banking choices? Where I shop? Whose voices I amplify?

And by the way, we are not allowed to use that corrupt material to build what’s next either. The stones of the fallen wall, its wood, and its dust, transmit impurity like a creeping animal, i.e., one who touches them becomes impure like one who touches a creeping animal.

Let’s build something better!

Avodah Zarah 46

I remember as a child reminding my mom of something she said and her saying that she had zero recollection of it. It’s so frustrating when you’re talking to someone and it seems as though they have no recollection of a previous conversation, or something that happened. It made me angry and frustrated. But my mom would just say, “I believe you but I don’t remember.” On our daf today, we get a sweet exchange with Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Akiva. Rabbi Eliezer has a condition where he has forgotten all his learning and teaching. And so he contradicts a ruling that he made himself! Rabbi Akiva gently reminds him.

Rabbi Eliezer himself taught him this halakha, which he knew as a tradition, but he had forgotten his own learning and Rabbi Akiva came to remind him of it by drawing an a fortiori inference that would cause Rabbi Eliezer to remember that which he himself had taught.

Today, I am a lot like my mom. I forget having been places, seen movies, read books and had conversations. I keep a list of books I have red so that I don’t start reading them all over again and so that I can remember that I read them. While my “condition” is not medical like Rabbi Eliezer’s and really just a result of middle age, I hope people treat me more like Rabbi Akiva treats his teacher than how I was with my mom.

Avodah Zarah 45

That’s a picture of Denali, also known as Mount McKinley. Gorgeous. Makes one understand mountain worship.  Mountain Worship is common in many cultures. Japanese have a faith called 山岳信仰, sangaku shinkō  that regards mountains as sacred objects of worship. Korea, Tibet, Napal, China, and Andean people (and so many more) have mountain worship as well.

In Judaism, we can feel awe and wonder when looking at nature, including mountains. The difference is that we see them as wonders of God’s creation, not gods themselves. The daf has been telling us to destroy idols. But what if the people are worshipping mountains? How do we destroy them?

As it is taught in a baraita with regard to the verse: “You shall destroy all the places where the nations that you are to dispossess served their gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and under every leafy tree” (Deuteronomy 12:2): Rabbi Yosei, son of Rabbi Yehuda, says: From that which is stated in the verse: “You shall destroy…their gods, upon the high mountains,” from which the Sages derived: But not the mountains themselves that are their gods, and: “You shall destroy…their gods…upon the hills,” but not the hills themselves if they are their gods . . .

So gaze away. Enjoy the wonder of nature and the majesty of the mountains. And feel free to thank God for them . . .just don’t pray to them.

Avodah Zarah 44

Today’s daf is graphic! We get people doing (let’s say) interesting things with idols.

A wise gentile, Proclus ben Plospus, once asked a question of Rabban Gamliel in the city of Akko when he was bathing in the bathhouse of the Greek god Aphrodite. Proclus said to him: It is written in your Torah: “And nothing of the proscribed items shall cleave to your hand” (Deuteronomy 13:18). For what reason do you bathe before an idol in the bathhouse of Aphrodite?

What’s his answer? Even if people would give you a lot of money, you would not enter before your object of idol worship naked, or as one who experienced a seminal emission who comes to the bathhouse to purify himself, nor would you urinate before it. This statue stands upon the sewage pipe and all the people urinate before it. There is no prohibition in this case, as it is stated in the verse only: “Their gods” (see Deuteronomy 12:2), which indicates that a statue that people treat as a deity is forbidden, but one that people do not treat with the respect that is due to a deity is permitted.

Ha! The men in the bathhouse are naked, some having had seminal emissions, and apparently, urinating by or around this statue of Aphrodite. But, there are other things you might do with n object of idol worship. (Warning, R rated Talmudic passage follows.)

What is the meaning of miflatztah”? Rav Yehuda says: It means an object that intensifies [mafli] licentiousness [leitzanuta]; as Rabbi Yosef teaches: Maacah fashioned upon the idol the likeness of a male organ, and she would engage in sexual activity with it daily.

Yep.

Is it too vulgar to make a joke about how women still say “Oh god, Oh god” when using items like this?

(Guess I just did.)

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started